<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barrons crashes Rediff party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.startupdunia.com/internet/barrons-crashes-rediff-party-544/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.startupdunia.com/internet/barrons-crashes-rediff-party-544</link>
	<description>Indian startups &#124; Entrepreneurship &#124; India Internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:25:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: satpalparmar</title>
		<link>http://www.startupdunia.com/internet/barrons-crashes-rediff-party-544#comment-6775</link>
		<dc:creator>satpalparmar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 04:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startupdunia.com/barrons-crashes-rediff-party/#comment-6775</guid>
		<description>@ Parisista 

I share your views and experinece you had over Rediff.But evaluation has nothing to do with quality.Rediff is a ready to use scarse resource in a apotentially big market.Evaluation is about future and no dooubt lots of potential exist.

Now I am sure you will have not have  doubt on yahoo or google&#039;s ability to use this resource to its full potential.

Question is not size of valuation.Its the the &quot;valuation&quot; it self.Why managment of  a known brand in potentially large market and decade of market knowledge doubts its ability to make it BIG?

What make them to think of selling rediff? Is it greed to cash the investment? or fear to loose market to global leaders?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Parisista </p>
<p>I share your views and experinece you had over Rediff.But evaluation has nothing to do with quality.Rediff is a ready to use scarse resource in a apotentially big market.Evaluation is about future and no dooubt lots of potential exist.</p>
<p>Now I am sure you will have not have  doubt on yahoo or google&#8217;s ability to use this resource to its full potential.</p>
<p>Question is not size of valuation.Its the the &#8220;valuation&#8221; it self.Why managment of  a known brand in potentially large market and decade of market knowledge doubts its ability to make it BIG?</p>
<p>What make them to think of selling rediff? Is it greed to cash the investment? or fear to loose market to global leaders?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parisista</title>
		<link>http://www.startupdunia.com/internet/barrons-crashes-rediff-party-544#comment-6731</link>
		<dc:creator>Parisista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startupdunia.com/barrons-crashes-rediff-party/#comment-6731</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Yahoo, Google after Rediff&#039;s poor customer service: A riff on their customer e-mail...&lt;/strong&gt;

I was surprised to see a lot of hubub around Rediff. Only 2 days ago, I had my own bout of poor customer experience with Rediff. Have you seen their shopping site? Sucks, big time. The strategy may be good but their execution, quality control and custo...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #eaf3fa;">
<p><strong>Yahoo, Google after Rediff&#8217;s poor customer service: A riff on their customer e-mail&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I was surprised to see a lot of hubub around Rediff. Only 2 days ago, I had my own bout of poor customer experience with Rediff. Have you seen their shopping site? Sucks, big time. The strategy may be good but their execution, quality control and custo&#8230;</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

